Performance + reviews :
built on what actually happened.
Get a complete picture of employee performance. Identify gaps and progress from real execution, and turn every review into a clear path for growth.
+60%
times saved on average for managers.
+25%
meaningful feedback for employees
Raul Guerlain
Genevieve DatiInsights
Alignment Score
74%
Overall performance
Progress Score
65%
Goal completion
Skill Activation
—
Skill development
Appreciation Score
11/15
Recognitions received
A review cycle is 90 days long. Most managers remember only about a week.
By the time a review is due, the details that mattered (the gaps and errors in March, the skill someone picked up in April, the appreciation buried in a chat thread) have already faded. Performance keeps the record so the review doesn't have to rely on memory.
Everything a review needs, gathered before you sit down to write it.
My Team
One view of the whole team's alignment
Alignment, gaps, and skill progress for every direct report.
Reviews
A system-generated starting point
Every review opens with a summary already drafted from the real data.
Execution
Performance tied to real execution
Gaps and stability score versus the team average, not a general feel.
Skills & Growth Path
Gaps triggers growth, automatically
Growth Path tracks whether the gaps actually held, not just that a course ran.
1:1s
Briefed meetings, not blank pages
A snapshot and suggested talking points, ready before the meeting.
Feedback
Appreciations and feedback in one thread
Peer recognitions, manager notes and feed appreciations, aggregated.
Execution
Performance data, not performance opinions
Completions, incidents, and how the report's execution compared to their team.
- — Successful executions completed within SLA
- — Gaps events — execution instability incidents
- — Stability score, weighted for consistency
Your Execution : this cycle
23
Goals completed
5
Gaps recorded
65%
Stability score
Dispatch confirmation – Start goal
Warehouse Pick-Pack-Dispatch
0
Recurring
1
Yet to assign
0
Awaiting retest
Promo visibility validation
Campaign Compliance Tracking · Sep 1 to present
Growth Path
When execution drifts, training follows — and gets checked
A drifted step doesn't just sit on a dashboard. Growth Path assigns the relevant course, tracks completion, and confirms whether a retest actually resolved the issue.
- — Every gap, the training assigned, and whether it helped
- — A plain-language interpretation of what drifted and when
One review cycle, two very different views
Managers see the full team and the data behind every rating. Employees see their own week and growth path, through Growth IQ.
The whole team, at a glance
Alignment score, pending reviews, and who needs attention this week.
Their own week, made visible
A weekly score, what shifted since last week, and the skills and recognitions earned.
Simple pricing for Performance management
One plan for the full review cycle (Performance, Skills, Growth and Feedback.) Pair it with another PerkFlow module as your needs grow.
Performance & Reviews
Execution-linked reviews, Growth Path and improvement tracking for every manager and employee.
Starting from
Final price depends on team size, and add-on modules.
- Unlimited manager & employee seats
- Execution-linked reviews & Growth Path
- Manager and Employees' views
- Unlimited execution history
- Feedback aggregation across 1:1s & reviews
- Priority support
Extend it across your workforce
Performance is stronger paired with either of these modules.
Strategy, OKRs & Projects management
Connect strategic plan to OKRs, so every team sees exactly how their work moves it.
Handover management & continuity of work
Shift Handover Management for the continuity of work between teams.
Workforce cost intelligence
Connect performance and compensation, so reviews inform pay and headcount decisions.
See a real review cycle, not a slide deck.
We'll walk through an actual review with execution data, Growth Path, and all.
Support
Questions, answered
If yours isn't here, ask us on the call — we'd rather explain it directly than leave it to a guess.
Four connected pieces. Managers get a live view of the team's alignment and what's due. Reviews give a structured cycle (Performance, Executions, Growth, and Feedback) from real data. 1:1s are briefed meetings with talking points, and Growth Path tracks gaps-triggered trainings.
Every review is partially generated from a Performance Summary (goal completion, average rating, and highlights already drafted from the period's data) saving managers 60 to 70% off manual work filling them. A manager still rates and submits, but they're adding context to real data instead of reconstructing from memory.
A gap or drift event is an execution instability incident — a step that ran outside its expected outcome, like, in logistics, a dispatch confirmation that came in 46 minutes late, shown alongside a stability score vs team average.
Each 1:1 is connected to a real Performance Snapshot, plus suggested talking points like reviewing goal progress or setting skill development goals. Notes and a growth plan built during the 1:1 feed back into that person's ongoing record.
Employees see their own metrics — weekly score, tasks, skills, and their own growth path — but not another employee's data or team-wide comparisons not shared with them directly.
The Feedback tab aggregates from four sources automatically: feed appreciations, peer recognitions, 1:1 notes, and manager feedback submitted during the review period — nothing copied in manually from another tool.
No. Reviews can be created as a named cycle or started ad hoc for a single person at any time. A review sits as a draft until a manager rates and submits it, so nothing goes final without a person completing it.
Still have a question?
We typically respond within a few minutes.